Resources for teaching online safety to SEND pupils

Regardless of age, ability or learning needs, the essentials of online safety remain consistent: look after your personal information; be sure you know who real ‘friends’ are; don’t meet anyone offline you first met online; and tell an adult if something concerns you. However, the media we use to convey these messages needs to be varied in order to put them across to audiences with the whole range of special educational needs and disabilities (SEND).

In some instances this can be straightforward. For example, Thinkuknow have produced a couple of videos specifically for older pupils – teenagers – whose first language is British Sign Language (BSL). These are well made, with age appropriate content, and using deaf, adolescent, actors that the intended audience can relate to. In fact, although there is no spoken dialogue, the use of sub-titles means that videos such as Sam’s Real Friends could be used inclusively with wider school groups. But this is a very specific cohort, with a clear learning need – materials in their first language, BSL.

Other groups will need different approaches. The STAR Toolkit was developed with learners with autistic spectrum conditions (ASC) in mind, although they could be useful for learners with a wider range of needs. They address several different concerns including ‘Safe sharing,’ ‘Trust,’ ‘Action,’ and ‘Respect,’ (hence the name).  However, the materials provided, PowerPoints and worksheets, will need adapting for the audience as some of the slides are quite busy, with a lot of text and some demanding language.

Widgit have also produced resources intended for learners with a wide range of challenges who may have difficulty in decoding text with materials which use their symbol set to aid access to a number of straightforward online rules.

The Thinkuknow website also has some resources targeted at SEND learners, which can be searched for by age range in their resource library , although the results can be quite mixed. In the 4-7 age range the same videos are offered whether or not the SEND group is chosen. The content across all age groups can be quite demanding, although age appropriate for the audience, but requiring a level of understanding that those with cognitive challenges may find difficult to comprehend.  One suggestion might be to use materials for a younger age group with a simpler content level, but this raises issues of age appropriateness.

Other providers have also created materials that could, with the right level of support, be helpful, even for secondary students. Discovery Education’s video on Youtube has very direct messages using cartoon characters. Whilst these are intended for a primary audience the content is clear and the presentation is not patronising, nor talks down to its viewers. The characters whilst obviously children are not of a particular age group, so may be acceptable to older learners.

A similar way of offering content focused on young audiences offered in a way that older students might find engaging too, is to use the Disney Corporation’s Safety Smart with Timon and Pum ba video which can be found on Youtube here. The whole video is quite long for an SEND audience, and in the balance of entertainment to education tends to favour the former, so it may need to be watched several times, stopping and starting to pick up the teaching points. There is also a shorter version. Whilst the content might need unpacking, it can prove effective, as ever yone, regardless of age, loves the Lion King so won’t mind watching the antics of two of its stars.

With the range and complexity of SEND, and the added layer of online safety being a subject that needs to be revisited throughout a child or young person’s time in school, the task of finding appropriate materials to engage and educate can prove challenging. But if we want them to live and to learn independently, it is a task that benefits from  a bit of research.

Quality assured resources for digital safeguarding

The London Grid for Learning  is bestknown for providing broadband and services, such as email, to over 95% of the capital’s schools. It is less well known as a charity that provides good quality curriculum content to its subscribers, including many free resources for anyone  who wants to use them. This is particularly true of its advice and materials for online safeguarding.

At www.lgfl.net/online-safety you can find lots of free to download materials, including policies on acceptable use for staff, visitors, contractors and pupils (including symbolised ones for those with low literacy levels); advice to stakeholders such as governors on online safety; guidance on British values; a model e-security policy; and official documents such as the Ofsted Handbook, among many others.

You’ll also find blog posts at https://safeblog.lgfl.net/ such as a recent one, “Parents – scare or prepare?” about how to alert parents to online safety issues, and specifically the advice not to list specific apps and websites, because this can spread panic and see them looking out for named ones rather than having a general awareness, it is better to equip them with an understanding of the issues overall, so they can deal with any threats that come along. Whilst there are apps you might have real concerns about, such as Bodyeditor which allows an uploaded image to be altered – perhaps by an individual seeking the perfect figure, thereby reinforcing attitudes of dissatisfaction  with their own appearance – in the long run these may be supplanted, or supplemented, by other ones.

There are also resources to address the very real problems associated with sexting. Very powerful testimony to the damage this can do was given by Megan Hinton when she spoke at the 2018 Digisafe Conference http://tinyurl.com/yy3cjlur . It is a thought provoking talk that will make anyone consider carefully the potential consequences of sharing possibly compromising images. More resources can be found at www.sexting.lgfl.net , amongst them the UK Council for Child Internet Safety (UKCCIS) guidance for Designated Safeguarding Leads (DSL) on how to respond to incidences of it in school, and the College of Policing briefing note for Police Officers. Links off from the site include www.disrespectnobody.co.uk , which is aimed at young people and includes consideration of questions such as ‘What is consent?’

For many school staff it can feel as though issues that arise are isolated ones that others may not be experiencing, so for a broad overview of children and young peoples’ online lives the ‘Hopes and Streams’ report, https://www.lgfl.net/online-safety/hopesandstreams, based on the answers of nearly 40,000 school age respondents, helps provide some insights. It offers statistics and case studies analysed by factors such as age and gender and could provide a useful starting point for CPD sessions.

Alongside the materials for staff are links to resources, such as the BBC’s Ownit videos, https://www.bbc.com/ownit which pitches content at an age appropriate level using presenters from their own programmes, or well-know Youtubers, to address issues of life online. You might also want to look up the Calm Harm and Clear Fear apps for smartphones that give an immediate response should someone be considering self-harming, or be feeling overly-anxious.

It can be difficult in school to find the time to source the materials and resources you need to teach, deliver training, or develop policy and strategic approaches to the whole area of digital safeguarding. The LGFL intend to help by providing this rich resource. A few minutes research here could save hours of scrabbling around with Google.